| To: | lord@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patches |
| From: | "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:11:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>, webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Beavis), linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200003311447.IAA32471@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:47:22AM -0600 |
| References: | <200003311447.IAA32471@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:47:22AM -0600, lord@xxxxxxx wrote: > > Jim I think he means source patches - thats a whole different ball of wax > from RPMs. > > Would a cvs update on top of an existing 2.3.99-pre2 kernel tree work > in any way - probably not because of the versioning in all the files. Hard. You could do it with a vendor tree in CVS and using cvs rdiff, but in the long run this tends to be troublesome (because CVS only supports a single vendor tree) > A sparse tree would work though. I created patches for the SGI kernel against 2.3.99pre2 using a separate 2.3.99pre2 tree: -rw-r--r-- 1 ak suse 753985 Mar 30 16:13 sgixfs-000330.bz2 I can make them available if there is interest. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NFS readdir seems to be broken, lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Another XFS crash, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patches, lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Another plea for patches, cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |