xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Things todo before we announce

To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Things todo before we announce
From: lord@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 07:11:54 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:57:38 +0200
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Configuration: 
> 
> CONFIG_XFS_FS=m
> CONFIG_PAGE_BUF=y
> CONFIG_PAGE_BUF_LOCKING=y
> CONFIG_AVL=y
> CONFIG_PAGE_BUF_META=y
> CONFIG_AVL=y
> # CONFIG_XFS_ARCH_MIPS is not set
> CONFIG_XFS_ARCH_NATIVE=y
> # CONFIG_XFS_ARCH_MULTI is not set

OK, looks like the same hang. Turning off CONFIG_PAGE_BUF_META should make
it go away.

> 
> I think I compiled with your change: 
> 
> ak@bert:~/lsrc/sgi/linux-2.3-xfs > cvs status linux/mm/vmalloc.c
> ===================================================================
> File: vmalloc.c         Status: Up-to-date
> 
>    Working revision:    1.9
>    Repository revision: 1.9     /cvs/linux-2.3-xfs/linux/mm/vmalloc.c,v
>    Sticky Tag:          (none)
>    Sticky Date:         (none)
>    Sticky Options:      -ko
> 
> There is no spinlock in mm/vmalloc.c
> 

I need to check with Russell, it looks like the CVS tree is not getting 
updated, there is an internal tree which is mirrored into the CVS tree
on a daily basis, revision 1.10 is what exists internally. I suspect it will
be a few hours until I see him.

> 
> 
> BTW, it does not boot on AMD CPUs when KDB is enabled because it uses
> Intel specific MSRs unprotected. I sent a patch a few days ago to the kdb
> list to fix this, but never got an response. You probably want to 
> incorporate this patch before you announce to avoid lots of 
> ``my kernel doesn't boot with XFS'' reports.
> 
Thanks, this is good to know.

> 
> -Andi

Steve


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>