| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/1] xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim |
| From: | Tomas Racek <tracek@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:32:34 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>, open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120730214946.GG2877@dastard> |
> > + > > + if (range.start > ULLONG_MAX - BBSIZE) > > + return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL); > > + > > There's no point checking for overflow on the range start - what we > need to check is whether it is larger than the size of the > filesystem. We do that after the conversion of range.start to basic > blocks, so that check needs to be promoted to before this. i.e. > > if (range.start >= XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)) > return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL); > > > start = BTOBB(range.start); > > end = start + BTOBBT(range.len) - 1; > > minlen = BTOBB(max_t(u64, granularity, range.minlen)); > > And that will prevent the overflow in BTOBB() just as effectively... You're right, that's a far better way, I'll change it so. Thanks! Tomas |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Change fstrim behaviour to be consistent with upstream version, Tomas Racek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Don't require to set $TEST_DEV and $TEST_DIR when creating new script, Tomas Racek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/1] xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH v2] xfstests: add btrfs snapshot function test, zhoubo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |