xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Bug#804255: Please update initramfs in postinst

To: Steve McIntyre <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>, 804255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Bug#804255: Please update initramfs in postinst
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:00:20 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20151106161941.15248.86048.reportbug@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20151106161941.15248.86048.reportbug@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, 804255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-cc: XFS Development Team <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 00:03:04 +0000
Resent-from: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <handler.804255.B804255.144702722713128@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: 9o4atQ/2S8PqjPGj2/mFHCWYGyr2xA==
Thread-topic: Bug#804255: Please update initramfs in postinst
Hi Steve,

----- Original Message -----
> Package: xfsprogs
> Version: 3.2.1
> Severity: important
> Tags: d-i
> 
> To make this work well, all filesystem tools packages for filesystems
> that are likely to be used for / and/or /usr should call
> "update-initramfs -u" in their postinst. This will

OK.

> I've checked your package and I don't see any update-initramfs
> calls.

(yep, xfsprogs has no postinst at all IIRC)

> Please add one. If you'd like help doing that postinst work, I
> can supply a patch - just ask!

That would be great, if you don't mind Steve?  Many thanks!

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>