| To: | Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: stable xfs |
| From: | pg_xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi) |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:20:32 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <1153150223.4532.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <1153150223.4532.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:30:23 -0400, Ming Zhang >>> <mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: mingz> Hi All We want to use XFS in all of our production mingz> servers but feel a little scary about the corruption mingz> problems seen in this list. [ ... ] XFS is complex but quite stable code. Most of the reports about ''corruption'' are consequences of not being aware of what it was designed for, how it works and how it should be used... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS and write barrier, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: file system defragmentation, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | stable xfs, Ming Zhang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: stable xfs, Ming Zhang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |