| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsprogs |
| From: | Leo Davis <leo1783@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:26:38 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1302600398; bh=i+VtrzdwuJiBtWVjTM8ogdfDoK8Wl2tTzUApoL1g8AI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ktQevoZOmO8SR5Qcf6dlvCr04s3Lt+lbXMQfMXo7VdvHR2wmIr9WnOoSjw6+usAJhg3I4zWbnt7wxTE2aygS8SZqRp7ZgfpibtCgxHqz9DdiC/W/Yelcjr5yxjWdiq1L8HLbcU6EmNeCRkP/GPyQ2s1Q0VPbgyMnCByKX0FvqE4= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lipANa+T6765xbAfBauUHcZ8Rf5hqxMaUA/ig5F1Svn+jRPTZxY5oskO2V6GgMRgQdo3FZ20kjG9V+1U0RyiY5uiBnNok/Rf1jj+Ax+cEAc9tb3QIqGi5PYh6XACD93oKdE+O6JBpZBzXI12oHaUiTRlEQLlcmat+gSchR+55A0=; |
| In-reply-to: | <4D9DF2CB.1020503@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <31342497.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D9DF2CB.1020503@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Thank you very much :)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: stress_buster <leo1783@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:52:19 PM Subject: Re: xfsprogs On 4/7/11 9:04 AM, stress_buster wrote: > > Hi, > > My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version. > I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this > is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS. > > Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk? No. > Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade > xfs_repair from the package? > I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving > others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the > risk... if you really want to try newer xfs_repair only, just build an xfsprogs tree and run from inside the tree. > Any thoughts? Just upgrade. ;) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsdatad/1: page allocation failure, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | fs corruption, stress_buster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsprogs, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 2.6.39, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |