xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

CVS XFS version vs kernel.org's kernel source one

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: CVS XFS version vs kernel.org's kernel source one
From: Messagerie temporaire Delmas <delmas.temp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:03:55 +0200 (CEST)
Reply-to: delmas.temp@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hello, 
 
 
At our company we've got a problem with XFS and NFS on the fileserver. 
The problem seems to be like one describe in bug report 309 
(http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=309) and which seems to be 
resolved by a temporary fix in the patch 108 
(http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=108). 
First of all is there a more "official" patch which resolves this bug? 
 
My second question is that why XFS module in the kernel source found on 
kernel.org is part of the linux-2.6.x-OLD CVS tree? I saw that when I 
looked to the patch 108 and a file concerned by it (xfs_iget.c). The 
patch replace a line by another one (make_bad_inode(inode); is replaced 
by remove_inode_hash(inode);). This patch applies well on kernel.org 
kernel sources. But when I looked at this file (xfs_iget.c) in the CVS 
tree, I saw that it contains both lines. So my question is what is CVS 
tree version? the file xfs_iget.c wasn't modified recently but it isn't 
part of "official" kernel.org sources, why new linux-xfs (I notice that 
it's a new one resulting from linux 2.4 and linux 2.6 merging in january 
2004) hasn't been merged into recent kernel sources? 
I hope you'll understand my message, my english is very poor. 
Thank you 
 
Cedric 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • CVS XFS version vs kernel.org's kernel source one, Messagerie temporaire Delmas <=