xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io

To: "jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx" <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io
From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:54:48 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "axboe@xxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jack@xxxxxxx" <jack@xxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <x49twj26edj.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1459303190-20072-1-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> <1459303190-20072-6-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> <x49twj26edj.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQHRlzGOmdVyB28MyEyyQ/rUxU8Y+Z+Ltf8A
Thread-topic: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 12:11 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > 
> > dax_do_io (called for read() or write() for a dax file system) may
> > fail
> > in the presence of bad blocks or media errors. Since we expect that
> > a
> > write should clear media errors on nvdimms, make dax_do_io fall
> > back to
> > the direct_IO path, which will send down a bio to the driver, which
> > can
> > then attempt to clear the error.
> [snip]
> 
> > 
> > +   if (IS_DAX(inode)) {
> > +           ret = dax_do_io(iocb, inode, iter, offset,
> > blkdev_get_block,
> > Â                           NULL, DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT);
> > -   return __blockdev_direct_IO(iocb, inode, I_BDEV(inode),
> > iter, offset,
> > +           if (ret == -EIO && (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE))
> > +                   ret_saved = ret;
> > +           else
> > +                   return ret;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   ret = __blockdev_direct_IO(iocb, inode, I_BDEV(inode),
> > iter, offset,
> > Â                           ÂÂÂÂblkdev_get_block, NULL, NULL,
> > Â                           ÂÂÂÂDIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT);
> > +   if (ret < 0 && ret_saved)
> > +           return ret_saved;
> > +
> Hmm, did you just break async DIO?ÂÂI think you did!ÂÂ:)
> __blockdev_direct_IO can return -EIOCBQUEUED, and you've now turned
> that
> into -EIO.ÂÂReally, I don't see a reason to save that first
> -EIO.ÂÂThe
> same applies to all instances in this patch.

The reason I saved it was if __blockdev_direct_IO fails for some
reason, we should return the original cause o the error, which was an
EIO.. i.e. we shouldn't be hiding the EIO if the direct_IO fails with
something else..
But, how does _EIOCBQUEUED work? Maybe we need an exception for it?Â

Thanks,
        -Vishal
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>