[PATCH 0/6 v2] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster vs xfs_reclaim

[PATCH 0/6 v2] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster vs xfs_reclaim_inode

To:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[PATCH 0/6 v2] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster vs xfs_reclaim_inode
From:	Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:37:45 +1000
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi folks,

This is the second version of this patch set, first posted and
described here:

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2016-04/msg00069.html

The only change from the first version is splitting up the first
patch into two as Christoph requested - one for the bug fix, the
other for the variable renaming.

Cheers,

Dave.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 0/6 v2] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster vs xfs_reclaim_inode, Dave Chinner <= [PATCH 2/6] xfs: rename variables in xfs_iflush_cluster for clarity, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 2/6] xfs: rename variables in xfs_iflush_cluster for clarity, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 3/6] xfs: skip stale inodes in xfs_iflush_cluster, Dave Chinner [PATCH 4/6] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster has range issues, Dave Chinner [PATCH 1/6] xfs: fix inode validity check in xfs_iflush_cluster, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: fix inode validity check in xfs_iflush_cluster, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 6/6] xfs: mark reclaimed inodes invalid earlier, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 6/6] xfs: mark reclaimed inodes invalid earlier, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 5/6] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 0/6 v2] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster vs xfs_reclaim_inode, Eryu Guan

Previous by Date:	[PATCH 2/6] xfs: rename variables in xfs_iflush_cluster for clarity, Dave Chinner
Next by Date:	[PATCH 3/6] xfs: skip stale inodes in xfs_iflush_cluster, Dave Chinner
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH 14/19] mkfs: add string options to generic parsing, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 2/6] xfs: rename variables in xfs_iflush_cluster for clarity, Dave Chinner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]