| To: | nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Things todo before we announce |
| From: | cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:48:42 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | In your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:54:52 -0500" <10003300954.ZM7142@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <200003291619.KAA22984@fsgi344.americas.sgi.com> <mostek@sgi.com> <10003300954.ZM7142@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Wanderlust/1.0.3 (Notorious) tm/7.108 XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) |
At Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:54:52 -0500, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mar 30, 2:19am, Jim Mostek wrote: > > Subject: Re: Things todo before we announce > > just a small thing, but it could become a headache later - is anyone > violently opposed to this change...? Not really... but I think a better idea would be to have /usr/xfs/ put all of our binaries in there, with links in /sbin. Once xfs becomes a standard distribution then we can put stuff directly in blah... > > ~/isms/2.3.99pre2-xfs/cmd/xfs/mkfs 52> p_rdiff Makefile > 64c64 > < install mkfs_xfs /sbin > --- > > install mkfs_xfs /sbin/mkfs.xfs > > this would allow the linux mkfs(1) to make xfs (via mkfs -t xfs...) > but would break any (of our) existing linux scripts/what-have-you > currently relying on /sbin/mkfs_xfs. > > cheers. > > -- > Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE -, cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Things todo before we announce, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS->Linux todo list (fwd), Jim Mostek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Things todo before we announce, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |