| To: | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the xfs tree |
| From: | Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:34:51 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, David Jeffery <djeffery@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20150902230342.125e23ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20150902121649.7a686b6c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C57DF728-E46C-433C-AA9D-209557D795E2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150902230342.125e23ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 23:03 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 10:45:29 +0100 Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > On 2 Sep 2015, at 03:16, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > ++ if (!ioend->io_error) > > > ++ ioend->io_error = bio->bi_error; > > > > This is incorrect; it can clear an earlier error status. It should probably > > read: > > > > if (!ioend->io_error && bio->bi_error) > > ioend->io_error = bio->bi_error; > > Thanks, I will use that from tomorrow. > Huh, now I've had my coffee, that extra check doesn't add anything. (There's no harm done in assigning zero to io_error if it's already zero.) Apologies for the noise. -- Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsrestore: fix 2GB directory dump limitation for multi-stream, Brian Foster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfs_repair: update btree ptr when attr node level moves to next buffer, Brian Foster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the xfs tree, Stephen Rothwell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the xfs tree, Stephen Rothwell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |