| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: fix use after free in inode_item_done() |
| From: | Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:04:17 +0000 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <531506BD.80209@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5314E912.9080708@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140303223617.GL13647@dastard> <531506BD.80209@xxxxxxxxxx> |
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 16:48 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 3/3/14, 4:36 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
...
> > which leaves the rest of the ili_done: code looking a little
> > strange.
> >
> > can you convert that now to be:
> >
> > ili_done:
> > if (iip->ili_lock_flags) {
> > iip->ili_lock_flags = 0;
> > return;
> > }
> > /* free the inode */
> > libxfs_iput(ip, 0);
> > }
>
> yeah, I actually had that first. Not sure why I didn't go with it ;)
>
> (Still looks strange to my untrained eye; "if lock flags are set, unset them
> and don't free the inode, otherwise free it")
>
I'd be tempted to write:
ili_done:
if (iip->ili_lock_flags == 0) /* don't return locked inode */
libxfs_iput(ip, 0);
iip->ili_lock_flags = 0;
--
Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 11/13] libxfs: modify verifiers to differentiate CRC from other errors, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: don't leak EFSBADCRC to userspace, Brian Foster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: fix use after free in inode_item_done(), Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH V2] xfsprogs: fix use after free in inode_item_done(), Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |