[PATCH 0/2 v2] Fix O

To:	linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[PATCH 0/2 v2] Fix O_SYNC AIO DIO
From:	Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:10:54 +0200
Cc:	linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

  Hello,

  this is second iteration of patches to fix handling of O_SYNC AIO DIO.
Since previous version I've addressed Dave's comments:
 - slightly expanded changelog of the first patch
 - workqueue is now created with parameters allowing paralelism
 - workqueue name contains sb->s_id
 - workqueue is created on demand (I decided to do this to reduce the overhead
   in unnecessary cases)

The patchset survives xfstests run for ext4 & xfs so it should be sane. Since
this touches several filesystems (although only ext4 & xfs are non-trivial),
the question is who should carry these patches. Maybe Al? But since xfs and
ext4 changes are non-trivial, I'd like to have a review from their
developers...

                                                                Honza

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 0/2 v2] Fix O_SYNC AIO DIO, Jan Kara <= [PATCH 1/2] direct-io: Implement generic deferred AIO completions, Jan Kara [PATCH 2/2] direct-io: Handle O_(D)SYNC AIO, Jan Kara Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] Fix O_SYNC AIO DIO, Al Viro

Previous by Date:	[PATCH 1/2] direct-io: Implement generic deferred AIO completions, Jan Kara
Next by Date:	[PATCH 2/2] direct-io: Handle O_(D)SYNC AIO, Jan Kara
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] xfs: Simplify xfs_ail_min() with list_first_entry_or_null(), Jeff Liu
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 1/2] direct-io: Implement generic deferred AIO completions, Jan Kara
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH 0/2 v2] Fix O_SYNC AIO DIO