Hey Greg,
The last mailing of this patch set went AWOL. Here's another whirl.
Greg K-H wrote:
> Was stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on the to: line? If so, I should have seen them
> through that, but I don't, which is worrysome to me.
I thought so.
> The 3.0 series is already in the last 3.0.11 release, so I don't need them, I
> think I need the 3.1 patches, right?
Affirmative. You only need the 3.1 patches, here they are:
---
This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which are important for
3.1-stable. Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for
3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1.
My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y.
Thanks!
Ben
|