| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: remove xfs_buf_target_name |
| From: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:37:23 -0500 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20111006210640.089607475@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20111006210607.175284390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111006210640.089607475@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:06 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The calling convention that returns a pointer to a static buffer is > fairly nasty, so just opencode it in the only caller that is left. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Yay! The name buffer needs not to be static any more though. I will remove it for you unless you want to re-post it. Other than that, looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 8/9] xfs: use xfs_ioerror_alert in xfs_buf_iodone_callbacks, Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: remove xfs_buf_target_name, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: remove xfs_buf_target_name, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: remove xfs_buf_target_name, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |