| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix the ltp Makefile to allow for installation of all non-c (scripts) files |
| From: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:26:04 -0500 |
| Cc: | <alal@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110713121320.GA28126@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAP57jx5TWxwaDhp6yY+b_tBb8_WTBaRPDCfdQ3pV4Bs-S869QQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110713121320.GA28126@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 08:13 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 01:52:43PM -0700, Akshay Lal wrote:
> > Current the Makefile only builds the .c files and installs
> > them in the $INSTALL path. However, the ltp directory contains a shell
> > script,
> > which doen't get copied over (installed) when a "make install"is invoked.
> >
> > This behaviour causes test 080 to fail since it requires rwtest.sh to be
> > present in the ltp/ directory.
> >
> > Tested: Updated the Makefile and ran a static build script & test
> > 080.
>
> Thanks, applied. (after fixing up mailer induced whitespace issues)
I see that test 80 is not part of the "auto" group. Anyone
know why not? I'm not even sure what it does; it may just
be unnecessary because it duplicates what other tests do.
But it's really quick (under 10 seconds even without speedy
hardware) so I don't see any harm to adding it to "auto" as
well as "quick".
Any thoughts?
-Alex
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, master, updated. v2.6.38-19006-gd0f9e8f, xfs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | MAIL ABUSE #332909778, Donna Steffens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix the ltp Makefile to allow for installation of all non-c (scripts) files, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix the ltp Makefile to allow for installation of all non-c (scripts) files, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |