| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 07/27] xfs: split xfs_itruncate_finish |
| From: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:05:24 -0500 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110706081138.GA5361@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20110701094321.936534538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110701094603.580931463@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1309926958.3381.61.camel@doink> <20110706081138.GA5361@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 04:11 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 11:35:58PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > The above comment (if true--I haven't really checked) seems
> > like something significant to preserve.
>
> The comment at the goto label already catches the important bits of it.
I was referring to this:
Aborting from this point might lose some blocks in
the file system, but oh well.
I don't actually understand what the comment means, but if
you feel it isn't important that's fine.
-Alex
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 00/27] patch queue for Linux 3.1, V2, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 08/27] xfs: improve sync behaviour in the fact of aggressive dirtying, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 07/27] xfs: split xfs_itruncate_finish, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 10/27] xfs: remove i_transp, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |