| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 27/27] xfs: avoid a few disk cache flushes |
| From: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:11:24 -0500 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110701094607.799498339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20110701094321.936534538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110701094607.799498339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 05:43 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There is no need for a pre-flush when doing writing the second part of a > split log buffer, and if we are using an external log there is no need > to do a full cache flush of the log device at all given that all writes > to it use the FUA flag. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 27/27] xfs: avoid a few disk cache flushes, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 07/27] xfs: split xfs_itruncate_finish, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 27/27] xfs: avoid a few disk cache flushes, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 24/27] xfs: clean up buffer locking helpers, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |