| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 05/27] xfs: work around bogus gcc warning in xfs_allocbt_init_cursor |
| From: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:13:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110629140337.417478423@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20110629140109.003209430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110629140337.417478423@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:01 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > plain text document attachment > (xfs-fix-xfs_allocbt_init_cursor-warning) > GCC 4.6 complains about an array subscript is above array bounds when > using the btree index to index into the agf_levels array. The only > two indices passed in are 0 and 1, and we have an assert insuring that. > > Replace the trick of using the array index directly with using constants > in the already existing branch for assigning the XFS_BTREE_LASTREC_UPDATE > flag. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 04/27] xfs: cleanup xfs_add_to_ioend, Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 06/27] xfs: split xfs_setattr, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 05/27] xfs: work around bogus gcc warning in xfs_allocbt_init_cursor, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 01/27] xfs: PF_FSTRANS should never be set in ->writepage, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |