| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 0/4] xfstests: fsx is fallocate challenged. |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:48:38 +1000 |
| Importance: | Low |
The first three patches make fsx use fallocate/fpunch correctly. Hole punching is not detected correctly, falloc/fpunch operations can't actually be executed properly, and the logdump code will segv on the first falloc operation it finds in the log. The last patch widens the fsx coverage to mix direct IO reads/writes with mmapped reads/writes as that was the test case that it was executing (instead of using falloc/fpunch!) when it triggered the error (a real bug) that lead to me finding this mess.... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2/4] xfstests: fsx fallocate support is b0rked, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: question on new feature complexity/possibility/sensibility? (^ Alternate), Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Would It Be Ok If I Gave You A Free Business Building Tool?, Shellie |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/4] xfstests: fix fsx fpunch test to actually test for fpunch, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |