| To: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk() |
| From: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 May 2011 15:21:22 -0500 |
| Cc: | Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <a7077b2b2f6f46ac48d03cff4ccede2feba18f07.1304453673.git.aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <a7077b2b2f6f46ac48d03cff4ccede2feba18f07.1304453673.git.aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 15:14 -0500, Alex Elder wrote: ... > xfs_alert_tag() can be defined using xfs_alert(), and thereby avoid > using xfs_printk() altogether. This is the only remaining use of > xfs_printk(), so changing it this way means xfs_printk() can simply > be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can > simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be > eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can > simply be eliminated. . . . In case it wasn't clear from my text, xfs_printk() can simply be eliminated. (I don't know how all those duplicates got in there.) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk(), Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk(), Joe Perches |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk(), Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk(), Joe Perches |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |