| To: | aelder@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Remove duplicate XFS from xfs_alert_tag, neatening |
| From: | Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:54:08 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1303850805.2080.164.camel@doink> |
| References: | <59d707d5d1bc37ef3a08fdd23c8e1fe72fa55fbb.1303419931.git.joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1303850805.2080.164.camel@doink> |
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:46 -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:08 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > The xfs_printk in xfs_alert_tag doesn't need an XFS: prefix > > as it's added by xfs_printk. > > Add format checking to the non-debug inline function xfs_debug. > > Miscellaneous function prototype argument alignment. [] > I'll highlight the fact that this was the last caller of > xfs_printk(). As such I think it should just be eliminated, > and make the use of xfs_info() or xfs_debug() mandatory. > They are clean, easy, and have meaningful enough names > that this should be fine. (What do others think?) I only wanted to point out the unnecessary "XFS:" duplication. Taking out xfs_printk would save some text & data. Do what you think appropriate. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Remove duplicate XFS from xfs_alert_tag, neatening, Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2 question about XFS fragmentation and _fsr: SPLITTED Q2:normal files, samba share, Janos Haar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Remove duplicate XFS from xfs_alert_tag, neatening, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstests: 253: test the metadump functionality of xfs_db, Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |