Re: [PATCH 1/5] percpu_counter: fix test in __percpu_counter_add_unless_lt()

[Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 14:56 -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
>         if (new_count >= threshold) {
>                 ret = new_count > threshold;
>                 fbc->count = fbc_count + amount;
>         } 
>         spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
> 
>         return ret;
> } 

I obviously didn't test the code I sent, but
you get what I mean...  Here is the way one of
the lines above should look:
                fbc->count = fbc->count + amount;

Or even better:
                fbc->count += amount;

                                        -Alex