| To: | Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture |
| From: | Tobias Frost <tobi@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:11:14 +0200 |
| Cc: | Martin Michlmayr <tbm@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, debian-arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20081017094615.GT4504@soziologie.ch> |
| References: | <1222893502.5020.40.camel@moria> <20081002004556.GB30001@disturbed> <48E4213E.9090508@sandeen.net> <20081016212500.GA27228@deprecation.cyrius.com> <48F7BC9F.4080909@sandeen.net> <20081017070109.GA30726@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20081017094615.GT4504@soziologie.ch> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
I tried xfs both on the old and new ABI. (my first try was Jan 2008, old ABI) ASAIR at kernel version 2.6.18 On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 11:46 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:01:09AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-10-16 17:13]: > > > So is this a regression? did it used to work? If so, when? :) > > > > The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423562 > > I just installed a 2.6.22 kernel with EABI and I can also trigger > > the bug. So it's not a (recent) regression. > > As far as I can remember (I only used old ABI arm) this is not a > regression. XFS never worked on arm for me. > > If you need tests on old ABI just tell me. > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture, Martin Michlmayr |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] allow 64 bit inode numbers on 32 bit systems, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture, Kirill A. Shutemov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |