xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: raid 10 su, sw settings

To: Iustin Pop <iusty@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: raid 10 su, sw settings
From: Brad Langhorst <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:54:04 -0500
In-reply-to: <20071231214223.GB3679@teal.hq.k1024.org>
References: <1199059239.13944.65.camel@up> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712311203220.23402@p34.internal.lan> <1199126586.3437.10.camel@up> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712311406190.1239@p34.internal.lan> <20071231201712.GA3679@teal.hq.k1024.org> <1199134501.3437.21.camel@up> <20071231214223.GB3679@teal.hq.k1024.org>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 22:42 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 03:55:01PM -0500, Brad Langhorst wrote:
> > Any opinions on the partition layout? Did you go to special effort to
> > layout your partitions on the stripe boundaries (actually i don't really
> > understand this fully yet).
> 
> So instead of the usual 255 heads, 63 cylinders fake geometry that is
> not a multiple of anything, I setup 16h/16c geometry that gives a nice
> power-of-two multiplier so all partitions *should* be aligned at a nice
> multiple of any size you choose; fdisk -l on the drive reports units of
> 128k.
Sorry to be thick... i don't understand this.
Do you configure the raid controller with these settings? or is this an
fdisk option?

thanks!

brad


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>