xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 9/9] Clean up open coded inode dirty checks

To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] Clean up open coded inode dirty checks
From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:47:31 -0800
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711231914300.12552@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
References: <20071122004422.GO114266761@sgi.com> <20071123180239.GA13229@infradead.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711231914300.12552@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 19:16 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> static inline bool xfs_inode_clean(const struct xfs_inode *ip)
> {
>       if (ip->i_itemp == NULL)
>               return true;
>       if (!(ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields & XFS_ILOG_ALL) &&
>           ip->i_update_core == NULL)
>               return true;
>       return false;
> }

Your code changed the test.
xfs_inode.i_update_core is an unsigned char.

I believe reordering the tests to avoid a possibly
unnecessary dereference is better.

        if (ip->i_update_core)
                return false;
        if (!ip->i_itemp)
                return true;
        return ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields & XFS_ILOG_ALL;



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>