xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on softw

To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5
From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:11:06 -0500
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707301021090.12456@p34.internal.lan>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707301021090.12456@p34.internal.lan>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 10:29 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:

> Overall JFS seems the fastest but reviewing the mailing list for JFS it 
> seems like there a lot of problems, especially when people who use JFS > 1 
> year, their speed goes to 5 MiB/s over time and the defragfs tool has been 
> removed(?) from the source/Makefile and on Google it says not to use it 
> due to corruption.

The defragfs tool was an unported holdover from OS/2, which is why it
was removed.  There never was a working Linux version.  I have some
ideas to improve jfs allocation to avoid fragmentation problems, but jfs
isn't my full-time job anymore, so I can't promise anything.  I'm not
sure about the corruption claims.  I'd like to hear some specifics on
that.

Anyway, for enterprise use, I couldn't recommend jfs, since there is no
full-time maintainer.

Thanks,
Shaggy
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>