| To: | Iustin Pop <iusty@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS shrink functionality |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:50:10 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Ruben Porras <nahoo82@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, cw@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070605080012.GA10677@teal.hq.k1024.org> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <1180715974.10796.46.camel@localhost> <20070604001632.GA86004887@sgi.com> <20070604084154.GA8273@teal.hq.k1024.org> <20070604092115.GX85884050@sgi.com> <20070605080012.GA10677@teal.hq.k1024.org> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 10:00 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > > > So given these caveats, is there a chance that a) this will be > actually > useful and b) will this be accepted? Theres no doubt that its useful, its probably the most frequently requested feature for XFS from the community. I'd imagine its acceptance will depend on code quality, testing, etc, etc. > The last time I tried to work on this there has been no real feedback > and I'm thinking that maybe the code will be too intrusive and will > give > to little gain to be accepted. IIRC, most people missed the patch last time cos it got bounced by the list (cant remember why) - that was why I missed it for a long time, anyway. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Reducing memory requirements for high extent xfs files, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Reducing memory requirements for high extent xfs files, Vlad Apostolov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS shrink functionality, Iustin Pop |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS shrink functionality, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |