xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] rethink removal of xattr syscall stubs (for now)

To: lachlan@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rethink removal of xattr syscall stubs (for now)
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:40:31 +1100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bnaujok@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, agruen@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <45895EBA.8010208@sgi.com>
Organization: Aconex
References: <1166490658.5572.89.camel@edge> <20061219100506.GA22779@infradead.org> <1166571069.5572.117.camel@edge> <45895EBA.8010208@sgi.com>
Reply-to: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 16:03 +0000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:05 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > | > Please apply as an interim fix to the original problem and to
> > | > the accidental new problems its caused, and I'll push through a
> > | > new patch in the new year.
> > | 
> > | There is a way to re-export symbols you imported from another
> > | library with symbol versioning.  That how for example libpthread
> > | works on recent Solaris versions.  I'll find out how exactly that
> > | should be implemented.
> > 
> > Ah, that sounds ideal - thanks!
> > 
> 
> Nathan, do you still need your patch applied or will you look into
> this new approach instead?
> 

The patch needs to be applied, thanks.  At a later date we'll fix it
differently, but that will take some time.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>