| To: | geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:40:28 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <45788927.4030207@falconstor.com> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <4560AB84.9060200@sandeen.net> <45784E71.4080605@falconstor.com> <457854CB.5030507@sandeen.net> <45787ED4.5070801@falconstor.com> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@falconstor.com> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:35 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: > > It wouldn't be easy for me to switch to a newer kernel, because it is > not just a matter of my machine --we have a product built for this > particular configuration. Switching to a new kernel would reset our > QA efforts. You misunderstood me I think - I didn't suggest switching kernels, just that you test out the latest. If its OK, then its relatively easy to search for a change that fixed it. If its not OK, then theres a bug in mainline which should get some attention too. cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |