On 2004.11.26 17:23, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 2004.11.26 05:11, Nathan Scott wrote:
> I tweaked a couple of things, esp. keeping the uses of GFP flags
> together in kmem.h and xfs_buf.c and dropped the timeout. How
> does the following patch fare for you? (could you also send me
> a Signed-off-by: line for when the final patch is merged in?)
Applied, compiled, module reloaded - looking good so far (half a day).
> Index: xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs-linux.orig/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> +++ xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
The patch is reasonably trivial and you changed most lines, but feel
free to add my Signed-off-by: line to it:
Signed-off-by: Miquel van Smoorenburg
Hi Nathan, not to rush you or anything, but I was just curious as
to how a patch like this gets into the actual kernel.
I assume it's XFS CVS -> testing -> -mm kernel -> linus kernel ?
I don't see anything in XFS CVS at
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/
yet, am I looking in the right place ?
Thanks,
Mike.
|