xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Questions about pagebuf code

To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Questions about pagebuf code
From: Craig Tierney <ctierney@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 21:49:22 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1083702549.4107.16.camel@naboo.americas.sgi.com>
References: <1083435856.2302.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040501194709.A23768@infradead.org> <1083446482.2302.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1083614597.24397.16.camel@naboo.americas.sgi.com> <1083698993.2376.4.camel@hpti9.fsl.noaa.gov> <1083702549.4107.16.camel@naboo.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > The codes might not be the same, but if it is a race condition
> > there still might be something similar there.
> The problem still exists I just don't have a clue at to where
> the race might be.

The doublewrite README indicated that corruption does not
happen when a uni-processor kernel is used.  I tried that
with my code and I still got corruption.  

Your test is a bit better (smaller, runs locally).  I can
help try and track down that problem.  It might fix my problem.
It might also indicate something else pathological that would
be related to my problem.

Craig


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>