xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3

To: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:43:53 +0100
Cc: David Weinehall <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Ho <andrewho@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dax Kelson <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Nelson <pnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ext2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200403030700.57164.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
References: <4044119D.6050502@andrew.cmu.edu> <40453538.8050103@animezone.org> <20040303014115.GP19111@khan.acc.umu.se> <200403030700.57164.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 07:00, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 March 2004 02:41, David Weinehall wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:30:32PM -0500, Andrew Ho wrote:
> > > XFS is the best filesystem.
> > 
> > Well it'd better be, it's 10 times the size of ext3, 5 times the size of
> > ReiserFS and 3.5 times the size of JFS.
> > 
> > And people say size doesn't matter.
> 
> Recoverability matters to me. The driver could be 10 megabyte and
> *I* would not care. XFS seems to stand no matter how rudely the OS
> is knocked down.

But XFS easily breaks down due to media defects. Once ago I used XFS,
but I lost all data on one of my volumes due to a bad block on my hard
disk. XFS was unable to recover from the error, and the XFS recovery
tools were unable to deal with the error.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>