xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Filesystem kernel hangup, 2.6.3 (bad: scheduling while atomic!)

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Filesystem kernel hangup, 2.6.3 (bad: scheduling while atomic!)
From: Mikael Wahlberg <mikael.wahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:50:23 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Per Lejontand <pele@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jonas Engström <jonas@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20040223144245.01c2e688@pop.xs4all.nl>
Organization: Ardendo
References: <20040223121959.A8354@infradead.org> <20040222164941.D6046@foo.ardendo.se> <20040223121959.A8354@infradead.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20040223144245.01c2e688@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:46, Seth Mos wrote:
> At 14:08 23-2-2004 +0100, Mikael Wahlberg wrote:
> >On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 13:19, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Mikael Wahlberg wrote:
> > > did you run memtest86 on the box?  do you some strange patches applied or
> > > external modules loaded?  What's your .config?
> >
> >No strange patches. Pure 2.6.3 dist kernel. We haven't run memtest86,
> >but as I mentioned above, we have 4 equal machines with error correcting
> >memory, so I find it unlikely to be a memory problem.
> 
> The memory might be fine, but the mainboard might still be borked. I have 
> seen this once with Dell kit. Asuming can be dangerous. If you can spare 
> the down time it is always a good idea to make sure.

Yes, but four new identical boxes... seems very unlikely. But sure, we
can try it when I get to the computer room (It is not at our site, but
at a customers)

/Mikael
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Mikael Wahlberg,  M.Sc.                  Ardendo
 Unit Manager Professional Services/      e-mail: mikael@xxxxxxxxxx
 Technical Project Manager                GSM:    +46 733 279 274


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>