xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT] Does the ATA 133 spec. include mechanical details?

To: freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OT] Does the ATA 133 spec. include mechanical details?
From: Danny Cox <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:26:40 -0500
Cc: XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1073948203.8061.7.camel@david.internal.NorcrossGroup.com>
Organization: No Organization at ALL
References: <1073948203.8061.7.camel@david.internal.NorcrossGroup.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Greg,

On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 17:56, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> But it looks like it requires the power and ATA connector to be at
> specific physical locations on the drive.  I know that older IDE drives
> did not have a consistent location for these connectors, so I'm nervous
> about buying it.
> 
> Does anyone know if the ATA 133 spec. requires the connectors be in a
> specific location, and if so are any of the older drives likely to also
> use the same physical layout?

        Sometimes: in the Snap Appliance (nee Quantum) 12 drive NAS box, we had
drive trays to hold the drives, and provide the slide for the hot-swap
capability (and a common plug at the back for both power and data).  We
had at least two kinds: one for IBM DeathStars, and one for Western
Digital.  We found later that Seagate would also fit the IBM trays.  All
of these AFAIK, were ATA 100, not 133.

        I *don't* know about newer drives, but I strongly suspect that the
"standard" is still what it was: do whatever feels good!

        Good luck!

-- 
kernel, n.: A part of an operating system that preserves the
medieval traditions of sorcery and black art.

Danny


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>