xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4

To: XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 13:50:46 -0600
In-reply-to: <1070909208.4918.0.camel@david.internal.NorcrossGroup.com>
Organization: Coremetrics, Inc.
References: <1070909208.4918.0.camel@david.internal.NorcrossGroup.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
I'm also kind of curious about the replication of updates and
backporting of bug fixes, etc from 2.6 and vice versa. 

i.e. will XFS version for 2.6 and 2.4 remain in-sync?

On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 13:26, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> That means XFS should be in 2.4.24?
> 
> Or in a later version.
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 07:19, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> > Thought everybody would be interested. Not everybody are on lkml.
> > 
> > // Stefan
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: XFS merged in 2.4
> > Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:22:16 -0200 (BRST)
> > From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > 
> > FYI
> > 
> > Christoph reviewed XFS patch which changed generic code, and it was
> > stripped down later to a set of changes which dont modify the code
> > behaviour (except for a few bugfixes which should have been included
> > separately anyway) and are pretty obvious.
> > 
> > So its that has been merged, along with fs/xfs/.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > 
> > 
> > 
-- 
Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Coremetrics, Inc.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>