| To: | Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: immutable bits |
| From: | Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:25:10 +0100 |
| Cc: | Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1069355316.1412.1.camel@bonnie79> |
| References: | <3FBCF711.CBEFC5EE@calibredigital.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0311201236060.14338@linux-sxs.org> <3FBCFFF2.6F8C3F1A@calibredigital.com> <1069355316.1412.1.camel@bonnie79> |
| Reply-to: | christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 20:08, Christian Guggenberger wrote: > On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 18:54, Greg Whynott wrote: > > thanks for the reply. > > > > chattr works wonders on an ext file system, it is what i spoke of > > actually. > > > > issuing "chattr +i foo" would cause foo to be 'unlinkable' until you > > issued a "chattr -i foo". i believe this command is only for ext file > > systems, but i could be wrong. > > > > this should definitly work on a xfs filesystem, too - at least it does > so here on my system... > oops, sorry. Eric is of course right - recent xfs code is needed - , I have had tested this on 2.6 and 2.4.23rc only... Christian |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: immutable bits, Christian Guggenberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 905022 - refcache, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: immutable bits, Christian Guggenberger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: immutable bits, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |