| To: | Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CVS-2.4.22: File system is too large to be mounted on this system |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 22 Sep 2003 13:04:57 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <021601c38132$486ee180$0100a8c0@campus.tue.nl> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309220848320.15741-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> <021601c38132$486ee180$0100a8c0@campus.tue.nl> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 12:52, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello, > > > However, if you're sure your underlying block device is 32-bit clean, > > change the INT_MAX's above to UINT_MAX in both places, and you should > > be good to go. If you still get the mount error, then your filesystem > > probably really is too big for the 32-bit kernel to handle (note that > > the 2T limit is a kernel limitation on blockdevice size, not an xfs > > limitation). > > > Is this kernel limitation also in 2.6.x, or does it support larger > blockdevice sizes? > (i.e. when LBD support is enabled?) > > Leon. 2.6 should not limit you this way, and 2.4 should get put back to 2 Tbytes soon. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: CVS-2.4.22: File system is too large to be mounted on this system, Leon Woestenberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?, Greg Freemyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CVS-2.4.22: File system is too large to be mounted on this system, Leon Woestenberg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CVS-2.4.22: File system is too large to be mounted on this system (fixed), Tru Huynh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |