xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0

To: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Aug 2003 10:44:04 -0500
Cc: Kai Leibrandt <k_leibrandt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3F4B73F3.1A08113B@ch.sauter-bc.com>
Organization:
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308241122220.16149-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> <3F4B73F3.1A08113B@ch.sauter-bc.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Simon - the RH9 kernels, where we turned O_DIRECT back on -only- for
xfs, together with the nptl patches in the RH9 kernel, seems to cause
problems with RPM - even if the RPM db is not on xfs.

FWIW, the other solution seems to be to get the latest RPMs from rpm.org
(4.2.x) which turn off O_DIRECT in the rpm source.

I still don't know what the underlying problem actually is.

-Eric

On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 09:51, Simon Matter wrote:

> Hmm, can somebody explain what the patch 1300 problem is? I have built
> my own 2.4.20-20.7.XFS1.3.0 and 2.4.20-20.9.XFS1.3.0 rpms and I'm using
> the 20.7 version on RedHat 7.2 without any problem. Did I miss
> something? Is there a problem when using in on RedHat 9? Of course 20.9
> has the nptl patches so should I expect any problems which are not
> present in 20.7?

-- 
Eric Sandeen      [C]XFS for Linux   http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.          651-683-3102


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>