| To: | Oliver Tennert <tennert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FS Limits (fwd) |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 14 May 2003 07:53:36 -0500 |
| Cc: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305141439340.13749@picard.science-computing.de> |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20030513104210.03f1b0e0@pop.xs4all.nl> <1052842530.22731.112.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305141330310.13275@picard.science-computing.de> <1052914311.1173.23.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305141439340.13749@picard.science-computing.de> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 07:41, Oliver Tennert wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2003, Steve Lord wrote: > > > > > > > Or the other way round: on an IRIX Octane, what is the maximum file system > > > limit for 4k blocksize? > > > > > > Best regards and many thanks > > > > > > > Probably larger than you can physically attach to it, the theoretical > > limit is 18 Peta bytes, not 9. The pages here (marketing info): > > Do you mean 18 Exabyte = 2^64 Byte, now (sorry for pestering you)? > > I am only interested in the XFS code limit. > Yes, sorry, its still early here ;-) Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Strange system behaviour when copying disks, Olaf Frączyk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - Use __GFP_NORETRY in pagebuf readahead code, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FS Limits (fwd), Oliver Tennert |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - recovery fix, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |