xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-2.5-xfs tree is still messed up

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: linux-2.5-xfs tree is still messed up
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Apr 2003 20:59:19 -0500
Cc: Nicholas Wourms <dragon@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1051368349.84512.10.camel@lupo.thebarn.com>
References: <3EAA8405.80901@gentoo.org> <1051368349.84512.10.camel@lupo.thebarn.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 09:45, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 08:05, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > A few days ago, someone reported that all the files (except 
> > xfs related ones) had been deleted in the linux-2.5-xfs 
> > tree.  There was no response, so I was just wondering if 
> > anyone was going to look at it?  Perhaps the scripts are 
> > acting up again?
> We are looking into the issue but haven't come up with a resolution yet.
> 
> xfs.org still has a full copy of the 2.5 tree.
> 

The XFS that is out there is not too much different than that available
from kernel.org in 2.5.68. Right now the issues with oss are not 
actually technical, we have been asked by SGI legal to go through
some export compliance procedures before hosting a copy of the
2.5 kernel there.

Steve



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>