xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - unwritten extents

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TAKE - unwritten extents
From: Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Mar 2003 14:48:07 +0000
In-reply-to: <1046784648.1367.9.camel@dstl.gov.uk>
Organization:
References: <200303040310.h243A8gX754331@dstl.gov.uk> <20030304081442.GA14913@wotan.suse.de> <1046784648.1367.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 13:30, Stephen Lord wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 02:14, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:10:08PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > Support for unwritten extents.  Create separate IO completion
> > 
> > Gratulations. Do they work fully already?
> 
> Yep, they are all there. The preallocation calls are still restricted
> to privileged user's, that should get fixed up soon. I also have some
> ideas for reworking how we use daemons for this and other things - but
> that may take a little while to show up.
> 

Please excuse my ignorance, but what are "unwritten extents", and should
I be excited about their support?

Cheers,
-tony

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>