| To: | "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS vs. ext3 |
| From: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 26 Feb 2003 09:48:46 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-list@xxxxxxx, ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030226150442.GC23962@think.thunk.org> |
| Organization: | Coremetrics, Inc. |
| References: | <20030226150442.GC23962@think.thunk.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 09:04, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Out of curiosity, what was the configuration of the Samba server? How > much memory, CPU, disks, etc.? Specifically, was it an SMP machine? > > - Ted Personally, I couldn't imagine a UP box, unless really fast with HT, handling a load like that, unless the RAID5 set is done in hardware, but even then, a fast bus would still be necessary, as well as a fast set of IO paths. To best support that, I'd guess at least DP. -- Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Coremetrics, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS vs. ext3, Theodore Ts'o |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS vs. ext3, Andrew Klaassen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS vs. ext3, Theodore Ts'o |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS vs. ext3, Andrew Klaassen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |