| To: | Dragos Delcea <dragos.delcea@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: su,sw suboptions clarification on fs creation |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 30 Jan 2003 10:19:55 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1043935942.6121.32.camel@busybox> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <1043935942.6121.32.camel@busybox> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 08:12, Dragos Delcea wrote: > > also, does "unwritten=0" helps performance? > the fs will be used for some datafiles of an oracle test instance (few > files, but big ones). > Your other question appears to have been answered, as to this one, for the moment, unwritten=0 is the default on linux and also the only supported configuration. Unwritten extent support is a work in progress still. In general, unwritten=0 will be a little faster. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: su,sw suboptions clarification on fs creation, Dragos Delcea |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 3ware - Itanium compatible drivers?, Greg Freemyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: su,sw suboptions clarification on fs creation, Dragos Delcea |
| Next by Thread: | 3ware - Itanium compatible drivers?, Greg Freemyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |