xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Acl-Devel] maximum ACL entries for getfacl

To: Andreas Gruenbacher <ag@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Acl-Devel] maximum ACL entries for getfacl
From: John M Trostel <john.trostel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Sep 2002 17:52:08 -0400
Cc: Leo Qiu <leoxqiu@xxxxxxxxx>, Acl-List <acl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209112306020.27526-100000@muriel.parsec.at>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209112306020.27526-100000@muriel.parsec.at>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 17:27, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Leo Qiu wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am running libacl on Linux XFS. I found that I could
> > not have more than 16 ACL entries for one file. After
> > a little investigation, it seems to me that I can
> > actually set more than 16 ACL entries on a file, but I
> > can not get them. I am wondering why there is such a
> > limit for ACL.
> 
> That was an XFS bug, and has been fixed a while ago. Your workaround is
> correct, though. The XFS guys will likely still recommend you to upgrade
> to a more recent version, because of other fixes.
> 
> With XFS you will currently get no more than 25 ACL entries; with
> ext2/ext3 the limit is set to 32. This has so far been enough for
> everybody; if you seem to need bigger ACLs, please verify that you can't
> use groups instead.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas.

With the newer treatment of ACLs in XFS, the number can be increased
beyond 25.  I have a working setup using a 128 ACE limit.  Let me know
if you need that patch.  (Although as Andreas says, people really ought
to use groups instead at that point.)

-- 
John M. Trostel
Senior Software Engineer
Quantum Corp.
john.trostel@xxxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>