| To: | "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Updated XFS merge status |
| From: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 22 Aug 2002 04:39:47 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <E17hoIQ-0001oD-00@ADSL-Bergs.RZ.RWTH-Aachen.DE> |
| References: | <E17hoIQ-0001oD-00@ADSL-Bergs.RZ.RWTH-Aachen.DE> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 04:30, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:18:06 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > >Other changes in the XFS tree 2.4 2.4-ac 2.5 > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >KDB - (7) - (7) - (7) > [...] > >(7) Not likely to go in ever. (political reasons) > > What are these "political reasons?" Linus does not believe in debuggers, lots of other people do, but not Linus. Search an archive of the kernel mailing list for the details on this. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Updated XFS merge status, Ralf G. R. Bergs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Updated XFS merge status, Ralf G. R. Bergs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Updated XFS merge status, Ralf G. R. Bergs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Updated XFS merge status, Ralf G. R. Bergs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |