xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

JFS is going into 2.4? What about XFS in 2.5.?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: JFS is going into 2.4? What about XFS in 2.5.?
From: Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Aug 2002 20:19:16 +0200
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi I found in 2.4.20-pre4 changelog something like this:

Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
  o JFS: Initial import of version 1.0.18 for Linux 2.4

Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
  o JFS: Fix structure alignment problem on 64-bit machines
  o JFS: Add hch's copyright
  o JFS: sanitize ->clear_inode, remove ->put-inode
  o Fix races in JFS threads
  o JFS: Yet another truncation fix
  o JFS does not need to set i_version.  It is never used
  o JFS: fix fsync
  o procfs entries should be created when CONFIG_JFS_STATISTICS is set
  o JFS: set s_maxbytes to 1 byte lower
  o Rework JFS's inode locking
  o JFS: Dynamically allocate metapage structures
  o Remove d_delete calls from jfs_rmdir & jfs_unlink
  o JFS: Fix handling of commit_sem
  o Add resize function to JFS
  o fix typo in fs/jfs/resize.c
  o JFS: Replace depreciated initializer syntax with C99 style
  o JFS: Trivial fixes

Could you do a web page describing status of integrating XFS into
kernel?
It would be great to have it in 2.4 (may be marked as experimental?)

Regards,

Olaf Fraczyk






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>