On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 09:24, Wessel Dankers wrote:
> On 2002-08-04 00:15:03+1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> > I don't see this problem, running xfs 2.4.19. mapcheck finds no
> > errors, the test case from
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=102408887618294&w=2 passes.
> > However I am running gcc 2.96, not 3.1. Can you supply a small test
> > case that always fails?
>
> It's the compiler itself that fails, once the source file is corrected it
> produces a correct executable. A simple test case for me is:
>
> % rm -f foo
> % dmesg >foo
> % ls -l foo
> -rw-r----- 1 wsl wsl 8557 Aug 3 16:18 foo
> % mapcheck foo
> 1 files scanned 1 files fixed 0 errors
If I remember correctly, that output means it found nothing wrong.
Steve
> % mapcheck foo
> 1 files scanned 0 files fixed 0 errors
>
> The bug crops up when the file is created. It also doesn't happen 100% of
> the time: when I created a "bar" file to test it again, it passed. I'm not
> able to determine what triggers the problem.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> You've been infected by the Telescoping Hubble virus.
|