| To: | Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NFS |
| From: | Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 28 Jul 2002 07:29:26 -0500 |
| Cc: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1027610148.23272.5.camel@two.nks.net> |
| References: | <20020724230655.O27801-100000@xs1.xs4all.nl> <1027550034.21591.13.camel@two.nks.net> <20020725063733.GB3940@thangorodrim.thompson.us> <1027610148.23272.5.camel@two.nks.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 10:15, Derek Glidden wrote: > > It's an option to mounting an XFS filesystem - not /etc/exports. > > Presumably it means something like "writesync" but I'm not sure if it's > still relevant to making NFS work reliably. > wsync has the effect of making all transactions in XFS synchronous, it was designed for NFS and is normally combined with turning on a synchronous writes in NFS. Basically this is for people who want to follow the original NFS spec - before the NFS server returns from an RPC, all associated data is spinning on disk, unless you have IDE write caching turned on of course. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unkillable processes stuck in "D" state running forever, Federico Sevilla III |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Unkillable processes stuck in "D" state running forever, Denis Vlasenko |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NFS, Derek Glidden |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NFS, Matteo Centonza |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |