| To: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - pagebuf |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 08 May 2002 11:12:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1020871711.19190.18.camel@UberGeek> |
| References: | <200205080421.OAA52473@snort.melbourne.sgi.com> <1020871711.19190.18.camel@UberGeek> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 10:28, Austin Gonyou wrote: > Curious to know what is being considered *small block*? (2k 1k?) Anything less than page size. And "boost performance" does not mean that reducing your block size is a performance enhancer; the mod you mentioned was more along the lines of "less slow," not "super fast." Note that none of this stuff is ready for prime-time yet, either... You should assume that the block size == page size restriction is still in place, for now. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - pagebuf, Austin Gonyou |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE - pagebuf, Austin Gonyou |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE - pagebuf, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE - pagebuf, Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |